Here is a photo of another bird I took yesterday while we
were birding at Minto-Brown Park. It’s
one thing to spot a bird with your naked eye, and then quite another thing to
find it with your binoculars to get a closer look, and then a whole other
challenge to re-find it with your camera. And in
this case the bird was a busy one, constantly moving tree to tree gleaning
insects off of the leaves. However, we have discovered that though difficult to
get sometimes, a photo is the best tool in making an identification as it gives
us the opportunity for a close examination and the luxury of making comparisons
with images in bird guides. What we use for guides now in the field are bird apps on our iPones, saving us from lugging around paper books. My first guess was a Yellow-breasted Chat, maybe in
part because that was what I wanted to see.
But Jeanette pointed out it didn’t have the white eye-brow. She thought the yellow abdomen was a clue
that it was a Western Kingbird. I didn’t
think that was quite right, back and forth we went, neither identification
seemed just right. Some-where along in
the process it finally came to me that it was a female Western Tanager. What
fun, we love the challenge.
Tuesday, May 13, 2014
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Like most species of birds, the female Western Tanager is harder to identify than the more flamboyant male counterpart. Several years ago, I was stumped, too, as to the identity of this bird, until a fellow birder identified it in the field, using a bird guide. These birds migrate so quickly through our area that we get few chances to view them for long through our binoculars. Lee
ReplyDelete